After 2 full days of lively debate, and a week to collate the notes, SPRITE+ expert fellows settled on 4 major themes that the challenge working groups will explore in the upcoming year. Here are the challenges:
How should we conceptualise, identify and assess susceptibility to future digital harm?
How might we protect networks, hardware, individuals and organisations from increasingly complex harms and/or make them resilient in the face of harm?
What roles will technology, people, organisations, governments, and societies play both in enabling and reducing digital risks and harms?
Digital Technologies and Change
How will digital technologies develop and become socially embedded over time?
What choices will people, organisations and societies have in developing, selecting and using future digital technologies and how could they exercise that choice?
How can ethics, regulation, policy, education etc. keep up with the pace of technological change?
How can legacy, present, and future technologies come together to form a digital ecosystem that works for everyone?
How might the concept of ‘identity’ change, and what will that mean at all levels, from individuals to communities to nation states?
Accountability and Ethics in a Digital Ecosystem
What new issues of trust and accountability could arise in the future digital ecosystem, and how might existing issues evolve?
What will be the roles of regulation, legislation and ‘self-policing’?
How could privacy, fairness and accountability be built into new technology (‘by design’)?
How will individuals and organisations verify identities?
What will influence future stakeholder perceptions of what is ‘good’ technology and ‘good’ technology use?
Digital Technologies, Power and Control
How do we create empowered, informed communities with the knowledge and ability to make fair choices about the impact of future technologies?
What could prevent future technologies deepening the digital divide, worsening existing power asymmetries, and creating new ones?
How can we develop enabling, useable technology?
How do we balance individual needs with the needs of a community, a corporation, or a state?
Who will have a say in how technology is used to inform decisions, and how will marginalised voices be heard?
These four themes in conjunction with the online consultation results provide a current view on the key challenges to digital identity, trust, privacy, security, in the next 5-10 years according to the Expert Fellows and everyone else who submitted their views through the online consultation.
Call for Events is now open! We're supporting Members and Expert Fellows to lead activities that explore aspects of TIPS in the Digital Economy. We will help to organise the activity with up to £5,000 to cover the associated costs.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.